This Not Exactly Just In:
Jenelle Evans will not be the very best mom on the planet.
Anyone who has tuned in for any episode of Teen Mom 2 or surfed the Internet for any quantity of time is probably going conscious of this reality.
But Jenelle’s health as a mum or dad has by no means been referred to as additional into query than it has been in the mean time, with Child Protection Services having not too long ago gone into her North Carolina dwelling and eliminated her three children.
Following a courtroom listening to on Thursday, Ensley, Jace and Kaiser had been all hauled away by the authorities — and it is unclear when, if ever, they are going to be returned to their mother.
(Jenelle’s husband, David Eason, is the organic father of Ensley, whereas Jenelle’s shares Jace with Andrew Lewis and Kaiser with Nathan Griffith.)
It’s a really ugly and unhappy state of affairs throughout.
Evans, of course, has typically made headlines for her controversial parenting strategies and selections.
But CPS lastly intervened after Eason admitted to capturing and killing his household’s canine, Nugget, as a result of it allegedly snapped at little Ensley and positioned her at risk.
According to varied reviews, Eason beat the canine bloody and mindless together with his naked palms earlier than placing it out of the distress he brutally inflicted upon it.
This story made nationwide information.
No one has come to the protection of Eason as a result of his actions had been indefensible — however is it time somebody stepped in and defended Jenelle as a mom?
We’ve been on the forefront of Jenelle’s mockery and we have penned one article after one other concerning the harmful atmosphere by which Jenelle has positioned her children, merely by placing them round Eason, his weapons, his mood and his penchant for violence.
And but: it is an enormous deal for a mom to truly, really, actually lose her children.
With this in thoughts, we have requested members of The Hollywood Gossip editorial staff to chime in and reply to the next query:
DOES JENELLE EVANS DESERVE TO LOST CUSTODY OF HER CHILDREN?
YES by Tyler Johnson
Put this one alongside “Is the Pope Catholic?” And “Does a bear sh-t in the woods?” on the record of questions which are really easy to reply they can be utilized rhetorically.
Jenelle’s children ought to have been taken away years in the past for myriad causes:
She’s been arrested dozens of instances — typically for violent offenses — her youngest daughter was born with medication in her system, and thru all of it, Jenelle has by no means proven any regret or willingness to hunt assist.
But, for no matter cause, the powers that be within the state of North Carolina didn’t act till David traumatized the youngsters by murdering their pet canine.
It’s shameful that the authorities allowed these kids to stay in such a harmful atmosphere for thus lengthy.
But now they’ve a chance to make issues proper by guaranteeing that Jenelle is rarely once more granted main custody of her kids.
Perhaps if she leaves David, she will be able to at some point show herself worthy of visitation rights.
But Evans has demonstrated again and again that she’s not succesful of offering a secure dwelling life for a kid — particularly so long as that monster stays in her life.
YES (PLEASE) by Simon Delott
Jenelle Evans is, all by herself, a foul sufficient mum or dad that no youngster must be condemned to her care.
This is a lady who makes Farrah Abraham appear like a mannequin actuality star – nay, a mannequin human being! – by comparability.
To these unfamiliar with the Teen Mom franchise, I describe Jenelle as “Worse Kenny’s Mom,” for these acquainted with South Park.
It’s a handy shorthand that provides folks a really clear image of what a catastrophe she is.
On a extra critical be aware, Jenelle has an habit that makes one nearly nostalgic for her erstwhile fondness for needles.
That habit is David Eason, a scary, horrible particular person and, based on the native sheriff, “the most dangerous man in three counties.”
David has served time in jail, however neither it nor the highlight of fame has made him much less of a violent menace.
The man shouldn’t be trusted to observe a houseplant, not to mention a toddler. I’ve been saying that since poor Nugget was nonetheless alive.
Will CPS rescue these poor kids on a everlasting foundation? That’s for a courtroom to determine. Unfortunately, we cannot maintain our breath.
Our authorized system locations far more worth on a mum or dad’s “rights” than it does on a toddler’s well-being.
The solely factor that our courts care about lower than kids is non-human animals.
David Eason could also be a dog-murderer and an all-around monster, however I haven’t got sufficient religion within the system to depend on them recognizing that.
He’ll in all probability simply be compelled to take some anger administration lessons and can get to go on residing his life.
Those poor kids deserve higher than what our society is keen to do for them.
YES (AS SOON AS HUMANLY POSSIBLE) by Hilton Hater
I actually needed to play Devil’s Advocate right here.
I actually racked my mind and tried to provide you with some angle by which I may argue that Eason could also be a violent bigot however he is by no means harmed any of the youngsters himself.
Or that Jenelle has clearly leared her lesson at this level and can re-dedicate herself to being a accountable mum or dad and can all the time put the well-being of her younger ones first and that it is a actually big deal to truly take away kids from their organic mom.
But I could not do it.
I could not get there.
This is not an occasion the place one may even attempt to make jokes or quips or puns or fake prefer it’s not an enormous deal.
This is an enormous deal. The lives of two boys and one woman, all below the age of 10, are at stake.
Yes, their lives are at stake.
Eason has murdered a canine in chilly blood. He has nearly positively damaged his spouse’s collarbone.
He can not management his anger and Jenelle can not management herself round him; she has confirmed again and again that she’s incapable of leaving the wedding and, as famous by my colleagues above, she has typically proven little regard for her children even when on her personal.
This is a simple one and in addition a tragic one throughout: Every day these children reside below Jenelle’s roof, they’re at risk.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
VOTE BELOW: SHOULD JENELLE EVANS LOSE CUSTODY OF HER CHILDREN?
Child Protection Services has taken Jenelle Evans children out of their dwelling. Should the Teen Mom lose them without end?
View Poll »